FOIA Case Ruling On Obama admin Document “Branch Without The Public Oversight, To Engage In What Is In Effect Governance By ‘Secret Law.'” -Ellen Segal Huvelle Judge, U.S. District Court December 17, 2013
Bill Clinton Appointee Fed Judge Orders Obama Admin To Release Secret Foreign Aid Document – Judge Andrew Napolitano – The Kelly File
The following Roll Call vote took place in spite of the fact that House members were not provided copies to peruse before the vote, even if they requested it. 87 Republican Traitors voted Yea! The means by which this legislation was moved and passed gives new meaning to the word “Treachery”. The House voted to give Republican Mitch McConnell his $2 Billion Earmark and voted a stipend of $174K of our treasure was to Millionairess Senator Frank Lautenberg of NJ’s widow in this purported “Clean CR”. Now that it has passed we will have a chance in the weeks aheadto review the entire bill and we will surely find other treacheries like a trick-provision that was added that will require a 2/3 vote to stop the next Debt Limit increase.This morning the Wall Street Journal in an article by Laura Meckler, Business Voices Frustration With GOP, writes that “In interviews with representatives of companies large and small executives predicted a change in how business would approach politics. They didn’t foresee a new alignment with Democrats but forecast backing challengers to tea-party conservatives in GOP primaries…”
This is just the beginning of a planned blitz creed against Tea Party Conservatives by the Establishment and their Progressive allies. We are now joined in a battle, not only a fight for Conservative values, but for the Survival of our Constitutional Democracy.
As Jeff Kuhner of WRKO in Boston recently stated, America has now become a functional “Dictatorship” under the tutelage of our “Dear Leader” Barrack Hussein Obama.
Lastly, the Wall Street journal today had another front page headline, More Illegal Immigrants As for Asylum, thereby joining next skirmish in our battle to save our American Way of Life.
Had enough yet?
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 113th Congress – 1st Session
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 550
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)
H R 2775 YEA-AND-NAY 16-Oct-2013 10:18 PM QUESTION: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments BILL TITLE: To condition the provision of premium and cost-sharing subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act upon a certification that a program to verify household income and other qualifications for such subsidies is operational, and for other purposes
The Barack Hussein O’Bama (a.ka. Barry) Administration has been secretly using our tax treasure to fund a racist, bigoted militant war against our government agencies. Obama is using the tactics that he fine tuned as a Chicago “Organizer” in an attempt to brow beat and intimidate government workers into advocating his far left propaganda and revisionist history. These mandatory brainwashing sessions have been carried out in the Agriculture, Defense and numerous other Departments under the guise of Diversity while in actuality it ‘s clandestine purpose was and is uniformity.
Bill O’Reilly: “Dr. Samuel Betances used his paid opposition to demean the United States and to indoctrinate his captive audience.”
“Talking Points believes the reason stuff like this goes on is the culture of liberalism that is now gripped Washington with a liberal president and senate the message is gone out progressive thought Is in.
And you know what that’s fine If it’s simply expression, but once the taxpayer gets charged for the propaganda that’s malfeasance that’s a misappropriation of taxpayer dollars.”
Bill O’Reilly is correct on his points about “…the propaganda that’s malfeasance that’s a misappropriation of taxpayer dollars.” and we as Americans have a Right and Obligation to follow-up on these charges and to insure that they cease and desist. This is after all America and not Soviet Russia during the “Cold War”. Our forefathers, fathers, uncles and cousins shed their blood to inure the freedom and liberty of our nation. As the torchbearers of this generation, we must insure that this type of propaganda and intimidation is rooted out at its core.
Call the White House, your Senators, Representatives and tell them that they are our servants and that they need to heed our admonition our face the political consequences.
Our country has now evolved such that there are one set of rules for our new elite “Ruling Political Class” and another for us, the new common “Serfs Class”.
Our Political Class has become a do as I say not as I do elite. Rabid anti-gun Anti-2nd Amendment Mayor Michael Bloomberg surrounded by 5 hefty security guards , leaving a conference, is asked a gun control question by a reporter, Jason Matter, who was also an attendee. Jason is immediately accosted by Bloomberg’s guards and then the guards continue to harass and intimidate him even after he walks away down the street.
HUMAN EVENTS BLOG
GOOD NEWS: MAYOR BLOOMBERG’S JOURNALIST REPELLENT SYSTEM IS WORKING PERFECTLY
By: John Haywood
1/28/2013 12:55 PM
My old friend Jason Mattera, now with the Andrea Tantaros show, participated in a stress test of New York mayor Michael Bloomberg’s journalist repellent systems, and I’m pleased to report that the system is functioning beautifully. The Mayor is protected from a number of things he would prefer his citizens remain vulnerable to, including impertinent questions. He doesn’t seem any more eager to declare his own personal “gun-free zone” than most other gun control zealots, but he’s strongly in favor of journalism-free zones:
You can tell Jason is mellowing out, because in his wild youth he would have done the interview with a Big Gulp in his hand. If he gets a chance to conduct a follow-up interview, I’m hoping he’ll ask if Bloomberg has ever participated in Barack Obama’s “frequent skeet shoots,” which I believe look something like this:
It’s remarkable how reliably the “why won’t you disarm your bodyguards?” question discombobulates the anti-Second Amendment crowd. They really don’t have a comfortable focus-group-friendly answer to it. The coldly logical responses – “because I’m more important than you, so I need protection” – simply do not sit well with the public. That includes people who might otherwise be content to ride in the gun-control bandwagon, until they hit this particular intellectual speed bump.
The question is not, “Why should you have a professional security detail while I must defend myself?” If that were the issue at hand, it wouldn’t be tough to answer the question. Instead, the ruling class finds it difficult to explain why they should enjoy armed protection while the rest of us are forbidden to defend ourselves at all, or must do so within an environment of complex restrictions that put us at a pronounced disadvantage against attackers. This position might be easier to defend if the Little People faced no significant risk of criminal attack, but that’s obviously not the case. It’s especially obvious if you know more about the recent history of law-abiding citizens defending themselves with firearms than the national media wants you to know.
Serious students of American liberty read the Second Amendment and see the right of individual citizens to defend themselves, and their families, against tyranny and barbarism. It is increasingly offensive to hear people with armed security details lecture us on how it’s really more like a provisional license to shoot ducks and clay pigeons.
Update: You’ll have to make do with the artistic representation of Obama’s frequent skeet shooting sessions provided by Messrs. Brooks and Korman, because the White House refuses to provide photos of our gun-slinging President filling the sky with hot lead.
Read the entire post and comments here: http://www.humanevents.com/2013/01/28/good-news-mayor-bloombergs-journalist-repellent-system-is-working-perfectly/
“Time and again President Obama has chosen to govern through executive fiat, and today a federal court has taken action to help rein in this abuse of power. The Obama labor board must cease all activity until qualified nominees have been constitutionally appointed to the board. Any attempt to continue this battle in federal court will only prolong the uncertainty the president’s unilateral action has created for America’s workers and job creators.”
The above statement released by U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline (R-MN) and Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions Chairman Phil Roe (R-TN) and the following is but just another example of how the Barack Hussein Obama Administration is placing OUR Constitution and our Natural Rights under SIEGE.
The 2012 National Defense Authorization Act now allows the military to detain without a trial any American Citizen accused of being a terrorist, or of supporting terrorists who plot attacks against the United States. Just imagine how this provision could be used against the Tea Party, for example, who have been deemed “Terrorists” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. In the following video, a prominent director with the Southern Poverty Law Center speaking to a group of university students, stated in October 2012 that parts of the Tea Party group are “filled with racists.”
The Obama Administration is implementing a program of incremental disembowelment of our Constitution and especially our Bill of Rights. His attacks are not limited to our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. Barack Hussein Obama has now instituted a new litmus test for our Military’s Top Brass:
“Will You Fire on American Citizens?”
Obama’s incremental disembowelment and usurpations of power will continue until “We the People” develop the Political Will and Political Courage to seize back our Constitution and our Country.
Obama’s Union-Controlled NLRB Thumbs Nose At Court Ruling, Chairman Vows To March Onward
Following Friday morning’s appeals court ruling that Barack Obama’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were unconstitutional, union attorney (and current NLRB chairman) Mark Gaston Pearce vowed to ignore the court’s ruling.
“The Board respectfully disagrees with today’s decision and believes that the President’s position in the matter will ultimately be upheld. It should be noted that this order applies to only one specific case, Noel Canning, and that similar questions have been raised in more than a dozen cases pending in other courts of appeals.
In the meantime, the Board has important work to do. The parties who come to us seek and expect careful consideration and resolution of their cases, and for that reason, we will continue to perform our statutory duties and issue decisions.”
“The parties who come to us seek and expect careful consideration and resolution of their cases…”
Mr. Pearce must be referring to union bosses ‘expecting careful consideration’ with his statement, because he surely couldn’t mean employers expect careful consideration before the union-controlled NLRB.
Heck, the vast majority of employers already know they face not much more than a kangaroo court with the NLRB.
That’s the reason so many employers are having to appeal their cases to the circuit courts these days.
Mitch McConnell and the Republican Party have once again capitulated to the Progressive Left for their own aggrandizement. A capitulation that will facilitate Barry’s Chicago Gangster appointments to our courts and to facilitate his UN Treaty Agenda and to finally pass Illegal Alien Amnesty.
Yesterday, Republican Speaker John Boehner capitulated on the Debt Ceiling increase just after his Senate colleagues with few exceptions ” Beautified” our incompetent and complicit murder of 4 Americans, Secretary of Deceit Hillary Clinton. And yes the House with too few exceptions, not to be outdone, continued the “Adoration” of this unspeakable wretch!
It’s Time to start considering formation of a 3d Party before it’s too late!
POWERFUL CONSERVATIVE VOICES | Thursday, January 24, 2013
FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR
Stop the Reid/McConnell Filibuster Deform
By:Daniel Horowitz | January 24th, 2013 at 03:02 PM |
Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell have reached a final deal to limit the filibuster, block individual members from offering amendments, and eliminate the ability of back benchers to block conference committees. The end result will be less power for individual senators and more power for Reid to parachute in unsavory policies into must-pass bills with little recourse to stop them.
You’re going to hear garrulous claims about the need to unfreeze the Senate from its state of gridlock over the next few days. You’re going to see a lot of reports about Reid caving on his plans to stop the out of control Republican filibusters. But none of the media reports will provide the proper context for this debate. Republicans are not the ones who have shut down the Senate, and the Reid/McConnell plan is not a capitulation from Reid. It rewards him for his bad behavior, and is not something we should support.
The Senate was deliberately structured to slow down bills. Much to the consternation of the modern day liberal, the Founders actually did not want government to do too many things. Unlike in the House where the Rules Committee controls the entire floor debate on behalf of the majority party, the Senate vests each individual senator – both from the majority and minority – the right to offer amendments to any bill. Harry Reid has vitiated that practice by blocking the amendment process on every bill, in order to shield his members from embarrassing votes.
He has also brought up a number of bills that have not even gone through the committee process. He proceeds to file cloture immediately on a major controversial bill that has not gone through regular order. In that sense, it’s not that Republicans are automatically filibustering the motion to proceed on every bill that comes up through regular order; it’s that Reid is preemptively filing cloture as a means of bringing up legislation like the House. To that end, the only recourse for Republicans was to filibuster the motion to proceed with debate, as a means of forcing him to allow amendments to go through.
According to my sources in the Senate, this is how Reid plans to proceed. He is splitting up his four reforms into two resolutions; one requiring 60 votes to pass and the other 67 votes.
First, he will offer a rules change that would need 60 votes to get over a filibuster of the rules change because it has been drafted up as a “standing order.” The Senate’s rules can be changed with a simple majority, yet to shut down debate on a rules change itself the Senate would need 67 votes. With a standing order, you only need 60 votes to shut off a filibuster because it only applies for this Congress or the next two years. So with 55 Democrats in place Reid only needs 5 Republicans to support his filibuster “reforms.”
The first resolution would provide two options to expedite the motion to proceed. The first option would allow Senator Reid to file cloture shortly after filing a bill. It would also eliminate the 30 hours of post cloture debate (often 4-5 full days in the Senate) on the motion to proceed. The kicker is that Reid will still be able to block all amendments and immediately force a cloture vote without regular order, thereby forcing Republicans to filibuster. This merely preserves the status quo problems while making it easier for Reid to get through the cloture. Under the second option, the minority party would only be allowed to offer two amendments and they would be picked by the Republican leadership. The majority also gets two amendments on every bill. So the end result is simple: Reid gets his way on the filibuster while still blocking the ability of rank-and file members to offer amendments.
The second resolution, as part of the deal, would take 67 votes to pass because it is a permanent change to the Senate’s rules. Among other things, this rules change would make it easier for a bill to be committed to a conference. Remember the conference on ObamaCare and the fear that the conferees would completely rewrite the bill and steam roll it through Congress? This new procedure may make that scenario easier for the leadership. Under the rules, it takes three motions to go to conference and conservatives have used that tool to prevent conferees from loading up conference reports with unrelated matters or rewriting a bill. The new rules change would consolidate the three motions into one and cuts down debate to only two hours. This provision may be the most offensive, because it will lead to less transparency and the opportunity for a bill to lay in conference for a year or two while pressure builds to change it and ram it through the House and Senate.
If Reid and McConnell seek a return to regular order of passing bills on the floor and going to conference committee with the House, Reid must agree to A) only call up major legislation that has gone through committee and B) allow an open amendment process. Then we can stop filibustering the motion to proceed. That would be true filibuster reform. If Democrats want to reform the Senate, they should tell Harry Reid to look in the mirror. This is the case of the arsonist acting like the firefighter.
Some will contend that McConnell’s plan is the best option to avoid Reid pulling the nuclear option and getting rid of the filibuster altogether with 51 votes. But under either plan, a feckless group of Republicans will empower Reid to steamroll individual senators and pass bad legislation. The bottom line is the Reid is being rewarded for running the Senate completely like the House.
Republicans must vote no on both resolutions. If Reid pulls the nuclear option, we should also use the nuclear option to create ‘point of orders,’ as we outlined last week. Most of all, if he pulls the trigger, conservatives must be committed to shutting down the Senate by blocking all unanimous consent agreements. We have no other choice but to fight.
The Barack Abomination Administration is now intimidating retailers into stopping ammo and gun sales. Both Walmart and Cheaper Than Dirt are leading the charge against our Bill of Rights that grantees every American the Right to bear arms. Barack Hussein Obama continues to spread Anarchy across our nation. Let’s boycott all those stores that team up to deprive us of our Natural Rights.
Report: Walmart Forbids Store Managers From Ordering More Ammunition
As gun and ammunition sales across the United States skyrocket and store shelves are emptied of just about anything related to weapons and accessories that may soon be banned by the Federal Government, some of America’s largest and most well known corporations are starting to take sides.
Reports have been streaming in over the last few weeks indicating that retail giant Walmart may be standing against the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and that their corporate headquarters has taken steps to restrict the availability of ammunition.
I’ve read various postings on message boards claiming local Wal-Mart managers told customers they are no longer permitted to reorder ammo inventory. I can confirm this is true.
I went to Wal-Mart today in our town to buy ammo. The case was almost empty. I asked the store manager when new supplies will arrive.
He said, “Corporate headquarters notified all local managers that we can not order any more ammo until further notice.”
Do Wal-Mart executives know that Piers Morgan doesn’t shop at Wal-Mart, but millions of middle class American families are the source of their wealth? What happens to Wal-Mart’s earnings if Middle Class America boycotts Wal-Mart for caving in to Obama?
I’ve always suspected the gun grabbers would cut off ammo supplies first. They’re doing it now. Next, they will use strong arm tactics to shut down ammo manufacturers. You’ll have a gun, but no bullets to load in it. It’s only the beginning of the communist agenda. This plan was prepared a long time ago. The commies are pushing hard and fast. They plan to overrun a confused and bewildered public that can’t fathom that a genuine communist takeover is underway.
Last week, Bank of America chose to stand with the anti-gun movement when they froze the funds of a licensed online gun retailer, reportedly telling the owner of American Spirit Arms that he, “should not be selling guns and parts on the internet.”
Supporters of the Second Amendment, however, are speaking with their wallets, having lambasted Bank of America for their actions, with many claiming they were closing their accounts immediately.
When one of the largest online sporting goods stores in the world, Cheaper Than Dirt, suspended the sale of firearms after mounting pressure from anti-gun groups and the government, thousands of comments from disgruntled customers – many of them now ex-customers – overwhelmed the company’s Facebook page.
It goes without saying that all Americans were appalled and grief stricken by the slaughter of 20 first-graders and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School, in Newtown CT.
“Although Obama claims to be an advocate for the 2nd Amendment, his voting record in the Illinois Senate paints a very different picture. While a state senator, Obama voted for a bill that would ban nearly every hunting rifle, shotgun and target rifle owned by Illinois citizens. That same bill would authorize the state police to raid homes of gun owners to forcibly confiscate banned guns.”
Last July, long before Newtown, Barack Hussein Obama strategically allowed his UN Gun Control talks to flounder because he was in the mist of his re-election bid. However shortly after his re-elected on November 7th, he immediately backed a U.N. committee’s call to renew debate over a draft international treaty to regulate arms.
The UN treaty would have still faced an uphill battle in the Democrat controlled Senate. As tragic as Newtown is, Barack immediately recalled Rahm Emanuels dictum, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”
And now Biden and Obama are threatening to control our 2nd Amendment by an illegal Executive order:
The following exchange took place yesterday between Bill O’Reilly and Charles Krauthammer:
BILL O’REILLY: Why does the president want to downsize the Pentagon, the defense department? Why does he want to do that?
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Because Obama has this ideological vision of America as a super power too big for its britches. And it’s a power that is thrown itself around the world. He talked about it in his initial tour of the world. And that it does not sort of have the moral standing to be the great power it was, intervening as it was, choosing where and when. And he wants to cut it down to size.
We are not dealing with an American Patriot but rather an ideologue who has been indoctrinated and influenced by such people as communist card carrying Frank Marshall Davis (membership card number 47544), Edward “Buzz” and Alice Palmer, longtime agents for the Soviet Union, Reverend Wright along with a host of other anti-American people, institutions and organizations.
Terresa Monroe-Hamilton writes in Home of the Enslaved on Trevor Loudon’s New Zeal Blog’s Noisy Room that, “According to Fox News and Mark Levin, the way both sides dealt with the fiscal cliff is a big step towards conflict and they are right as well. Just what does everyone think will happen when food stamps, social security, disability, pensions etc. stop, because there is no more money or money is worthless due to hyperinflation from printing? What do they think will happen when the government moves to confiscate our guns? (You think this is about protecting “the children?” Dream on.) It won’t be pretty in either scenario. Taxes, brought on the Declaration of Independence. The seizure of arms, sparked the American Revolution.
So there you have it. Obama is setting up America for a massive economic crash the likes of which will make the Great depression of 1929 seem like a cakewalk. He has nominated Chuck Hagel to preside over the collapse of our military that will complete the job that Leon Panetta began. John Kerry has been nominated to pursue our further alligence and domination bythe United Nations and to complete our dimlomatic demise as a world leader.
Our enormous debt collapse will indeed result in our children and grandchildren becoming indentured serfs. But we will not escape either. When the economic collapse occurs within the next 5 years , there will be insurrection in our streets and we will be in the mist of it.