Benghazi Scandal – Rice: Obama Admin Did Not Mislead Americans On Benghazi Terror Attack – Fox Report

February 23, 2014 in Benghazi Coverup, Benghazi Gate, Hillary Clinton, Obama's America 2016, Obamanation, President Obama, Slacker In Chief, Terrorism, United State Military, US Military

Benghazi AABenghazi Scandal – Rice: Obama Admin Did Not Mislead Americans On Benghazi Terror Attack – Fox Report

Rice Admits Some Info On Benghazi Was Incorrect, Says She Has Not Regrets

Sen McCain (R-AZ): “Almost Speechless At Susan Rice’s Benghazi Claim
Benghazi Fall Out Rice Admit’s Some Info Was Incorrect


How Many More “Lies” Are We Going To Take From This BS Artist.
==============================­=========­=­===
**Please Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More “Mass Tea Party” Videos:
http://goo.gl/Z5ShLs
==============================­=========­=­===

Media Stonewalls Obama Administration’s Benghazi-Gate Scandal

October 30, 2012 in Abuse of Power, America's Collapse, America's Heritage, Anarchy, Benghazi Coverup, Benghazi Gate, Congress, Constitutional, DICTATORSHIP, Election, Foreign Policy, Hope and Change, Liars, Liberty, National Security, Patriotism, Political Courage, President Obama, Redistribution of Wealth, Repeal Obamacare, Slacker In Chief, Terrorism, The Hope and The Change, The Stakes for the 2012 Election, United States Sovereignty, Who Is Barack Hussein Obama?

As you may know, it has become increasingly difficult for individuals and groups to read or hear responsible reporting  of political events publicized through our national news channels. With few exceptions, it would also appear that with Benghazi-gate, America’s  “Free Press” has finally fully succumbed to  a political party’s “Propaganda Machine” and has now become  fully immersed as a willing co-conspirator  in  suppressing politically sensitive  misconduct.

Consequently, it has once again come own to us as individuals, who have access and knowledge of these misconducts, to spread the alarm and inform family and friends before our Capitalist Republic is transformed into a 3d world Socialist Dictatorship.

Libya Attack Misinformation – Obama Again Does Not Answer Questions! – 10-30-2012

If You Don’t Vote For Obama You are A Racist! According To Chris Matthews. – Wow!!!!! – Herman Cain Weighs In

October 23, 2012 in Anarchy, Obama's America 2016, Propaganda, Racist, Slacker In Chief

If You Don’t Vote For Obama You are A Racist According To Chris Matthews

Matthews: Romney Supporters Being Fueled By Racial Hatred

Also Ed Schults Needs His Meds – Wow!

America Wake Up!!!!

Presidential Debate III was more like “Rocky” Round 16, an afterthought where  neither boxer really lands a clean punch on the other and where the crowd has  dozed off or gone to bed. Only in the land of MSNBC were sparks flying.

Famously tingly MSNBC host Chris Matthews  decided the whole race came down to, well, race. In one of the more outlandish  rants of an outlandish career, Matthews said the right hates Obama more than  they want to destroy Al Qaeda, according to The Hill.  The rant is too priceless to edit:

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/10/23/post-debate-msnbcs-matthews-claims-romney-supporters-fueled-by-racial-hatred/#ixzz2ABGYZS7y

Obama Caves To Putin, Abandons Reagan’s Radio Liberty

October 20, 2012 in Freedom, Liberty, Obamanation, Oust Obama, President Obama, President Ronald Reagan, Slacker In Chief, The Hope and The Change

Richard  Viguerie’s
Conservative HQ
By George Rasley | 10/16/12

While Americans are distracted by the presidential campaign, which has focused more and more on jobs and the economy, President Barack Obama has stealthily abandoned one of the cornerstones of Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy: Radio Liberty.

Obama PutinThe Obama administration claims the station was driven from the airwaves by a new law pushed by Russian President Vladimir Putin that bars foreign-owned media from broadcasting on AM radio frequencies.

Does this mean it was legal for Radio Liberty to broadcast to the Soviet Union back at the height of the Cold War, and the Russians just got around to realizing all they needed to do was change the law and we’d give up?

Of course not.

The real reason, as NewsMax quoted one Radio Free Europe source putting it somewhat indelicately is, “because they don’t want to piss off the Russians.”

As the NewsMax source also observed, “Putin is very sophisticated and knows how to work the Americans… The reaction [by the Obama administration] has been too limp.”

This is nothing more than capitulating to Putin, and the contrast with Ronald Reagan couldn’t be starker.

Reagan understood that to defeat the communist enemies of freedom, we had to engage them on every battlefield of national power: cultural, economic and military. That is why he pumped up Radio Liberty and the Voice of America, supported the Solidarity labor movement in Poland, deployed America’s technological and industrial prowess in merciless military competition with the Soviets and made liberating the captive people of the Soviet empire the foundation of his foreign policy.

As Reagan said so eloquently in his second inaugural address, “America must remain freedom’s staunchest friend, for freedom is our best ally and it is the world’s only hope to conquer poverty and preserve peace. Every blow we inflict against poverty will be a blow against its dark allies of oppression and war. Every victory for human freedom will be a victory for world peace.”

Radio Liberty and the Voice of America were important parts of Reagan’s strategy to let the world know that America was “freedom’s staunchest friend,” in spite of the fact they would “piss off the Russians.”

Radio Liberty and Voice of America were, and are, important to something that Ronald Reagan did so well, but that Barack Obama seems utterly incapable of understanding, let alone doing – selling freedom around the world.

Scientific Data Continues to Debunk “Global Warming” Fear Mongering

October 19, 2012 in Agenda 21, Environment, Hope and Change, Obamanation, Oust Obama, President Obama, Slacker In Chief, Socialist, United States Sovereignty

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released… and here is the chart to prove it

  • The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures
  • This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996

By DAVID ROSE

London’s Daily Mail

PUBLISHED: 16:42 EST, 13 October 2012 | UPDATED: 08:59 EST, 16 October 2012

The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week. 

The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.

This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years.

global temperature changesglobal temperature changes

 

Research: The new figures mean that the ¿pause¿ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. This picture shows an iceberg melting in Eastern Greenland Research: The new figures mean that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. This picture shows an iceberg melting in Eastern Greenland

The new data, compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea, was issued  quietly on the internet, without any media fanfare, and, until today, it has not been reported.

This stands in sharp contrast  to the release of the previous  figures six months ago, which went only to the end of 2010 – a very warm year.

Ending the data then means it is possible to show a slight warming trend since 1997, but 2011 and the first eight months of 2012 were much cooler, and thus this trend is erased.

 

 

Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.

Others disagreed. Professor Judith Curry, who is the head of the climate science department at America’s prestigious Georgia Tech university, told The Mail on Sunday that it was clear that the computer models used to predict future warming were ‘deeply flawed’.

Even Prof Jones admitted that he and his colleagues did not understand the impact of ‘natural variability’ – factors such as long-term ocean temperature cycles and changes in the output of the sun. However, he said he was still convinced that the current decade would end up significantly warmer than the previous two.

Professor Phil Jones
Dr Judith A Curry

Disagreement: Professor Phil Jones, left, from the University of East Anglia, dismissed the significance of the plateau. Professor Judith Curry, right, from Georgia Tech university in America, disagreed, saying the computer models used to predict future warming were ‘deeply flawed’

Warmer: Since 1880 the world has warmed by 0.75 degrees Celsius. This image shows floating icebergs in GreenlandWarmer: Since 1880 the world has warmed by 0.75 degrees Celsius. This image shows floating icebergs in Greenland

The regular data collected on global temperature is called Hadcrut 4, as it is jointly issued by the Met Office’s Hadley Centre and Prof Jones’s Climatic Research Unit.

Since 1880, when worldwide industrialisation began to gather pace and reliable statistics were first collected on a global scale, the world has warmed by 0.75 degrees Celsius.

Some scientists have claimed that this rate of warming is set to increase hugely without drastic cuts to carbon-dioxide emissions, predicting a catastrophic increase of up to a further five degrees  Celsius by the end of the century.

The new figures were released as the Government made clear that it would ‘bend’ its own  carbon-dioxide rules and build new power stations to try to combat the threat of blackouts. 

At last week’s Conservative Party Conference, the new Energy Minister, John Hayes, promised that ‘the high-flown theories of bourgeois Left-wing academics will not override the interests of ordinary people who need fuel for heat, light and transport – energy policies, you might say, for the many, not the few’ – a pledge that has triggered fury from green activists, who fear reductions in the huge subsidies given to wind-turbine firms.

Flawed science costs us dearly

 

Here are three not-so trivial questions you probably won’t find in your next pub quiz. First, how much warmer has the world become since a) 1880 and  b) the beginning of 1997? And what has this got to do with your ever-increasing energy bill?

You may find the answers to the first two surprising. Since 1880, when reliable temperature records began to be kept across most of the globe, the world has warmed by about 0.75 degrees Celsius.

From the start of 1997 until August 2012, however, figures released last week show the answer is zero: the trend, derived from the aggregate data collected from more than 3,000 worldwide measuring points, has been flat.

Surprising: News that the world has got no warmer for the past 16 years will come as something of a shock. This picture shows drifting ice in CanadaSurprising: News that the world has got no warmer for the past 16 years will come as something of a shock. This picture shows drifting ice in Canada

Not that there has been any  coverage in the media, which usually reports climate issues assiduously, since the figures were quietly release online with no accompanying press release – unlike six months ago when they showed a slight warming trend.

The answer to the third question is perhaps the most familiar. Your bills are going up, at least in part, because of the array of ‘green’ subsidies being provided to the renewable energy industry, chiefly wind.

They will cost the average household about £100 this year. This is set to rise steadily higher – yet it  is being imposed for only one  reason: the widespread conviction, which is shared by politicians of all stripes and drilled into children at primary schools, that, without drastic action to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions, global warming is certain soon to accelerate, with truly catastrophic consequences by the end of the century – when temperatures could be up to five degrees higher.

Hence the significance of those first two answers. Global industrialisation over the past 130 years has made relatively little difference.

And with the country committed by Act of Parliament to reducing CO2 by 80 per cent by 2050, a project that will cost hundreds of billions, the news that the world has got no warmer for the past 16 years comes as something of a shock.

It poses a fundamental challenge to the assumptions underlying every aspect of energy and climate change policy.

This ‘plateau’ in rising temperatures does not mean that global warming won’t at some point resume.

But according to increasing numbers of serious climate scientists, it does suggest that the computer models that have for years been predicting imminent doom, such as  those used by the Met Office and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are flawed, and that the climate is far more complex than the models assert.

‘The new data confirms the existence of a pause in global warming,’ Professor Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Science at America’s Georgia Tech university, told me yesterday.

‘Climate models are very complex, but they are imperfect and incomplete. Natural variability  [the impact of factors such as long-term temperature cycles in the oceans and the output of the sun] has been shown over the past two decades to have a magnitude that dominates the greenhouse warming effect.

‘It is becoming increasingly apparent that our attribution of warming since 1980 and future projections of climate change needs to consider natural internal variability as a factor of fundamental importance.’

Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, who found himself at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ scandal over leaked emails three years ago, would not normally be expected to agree with her. Yet on two important points, he did.

The data does suggest a plateau, he admitted, and without a major El Nino event – the sudden, dramatic warming of the southern Pacific which takes place unpredictably and always has a huge effect on global weather – ‘it could go on for a while’.

Like Prof Curry, Prof Jones also admitted that the climate models were imperfect: ‘We don’t fully understand how to input things like changes in the oceans, and because we don’t fully understand it you could say that natural variability is now working to suppress the warming. We don’t know what natural variability is doing.’

Headache: The evidence is beginning to suggest that global warming may be happening much slower than the catastrophists have claimed ¿ a conclusion with enormous policy implications for politicians at Westminster, picturedHeadache: The evidence is beginning to suggest that global warming may be happening much slower than the catastrophists have claimed – a conclusion with enormous policy implications for politicians at Westminster, pictured

Yet he insisted that 15 or 16 years is not a significant period: pauses of such length had always been expected, he said.

Yet in 2009, when the plateau was already becoming apparent and being discussed by scientists, he told a colleague in one of the Climategate emails: ‘Bottom  line: the “no upward trend” has to  continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.’

But although that point has now been passed, he said that he hadn’t changed his mind about the  models’ gloomy predictions:  ‘I still think that the current decade which began in 2010 will be warmer by about 0.17 degrees than the previous one, which was warmer than the Nineties.’

Only if that did not happen would he seriously begin to  wonder whether something more profound might be happening. In other words, though five years ago he seemed to be saying that 15 years without warming would make him ‘worried’, that period has now become 20 years.

Meanwhile, his Met Office  colleagues were sticking to their guns. A spokesman said: ‘Choosing a starting or end point on short-term scales can be very misleading. Climate change can only be detected from multi-decadal timescales due to the inherent variability in the climate system.’

He said that for the plateau to last any more than 15 years was ‘unlikely’. Asked about a prediction that the Met Office made in 2009 – that three of the ensuing five years would set a new world temperature record – he made no comment. With no sign of a strong El Nino next year, the prospects of this happening are remote.

Why all this matters should be obvious. Every quarter, statistics on the economy’s output and  models of future performance have a huge impact on our lives. They trigger a range of policy responses from the Bank of England and the Treasury, and myriad decisions by private businesses.

Yet it has steadily become apparent since the 2008 crash that both the statistics and the modelling are extremely unreliable. To plan the future around them makes about as much sense as choosing a wedding date three months’ hence on the basis of a long-term weather forecast.

Few people would be so foolish. But decisions of far deeper and more costly significance than those derived from output figures have been and are still being made on the basis of climate predictions, not of the next three months but of the coming century – and this despite the fact that Phil Jones and his colleagues now admit they do not understand the role of ‘natural variability’.

The most depressing feature  of this debate is that anyone who questions the alarmist, doomsday scenario will automatically be labelled a climate change ‘denier’, and accused of jeopardising the future of humanity.

So let’s be clear. Yes: global warming is real, and some of it at least has been caused by the CO2 emitted by fossil fuels. But the evidence is beginning to suggest that it may be happening much slower than the catastrophists have claimed – a conclusion with enormous policy implications.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released–chart-prove-it.html#ixzz29lRM1Drk
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

A Chilling Letter from Proctor & Gamble to Obama

October 17, 2012 in Abuse of Power, America's Collapse, Benghazi Coverup, Budget, censorship, Constitutional, Debt Crisis, DICTATORSHIP, DOJ, Economic Deception, Economy, Election, Energy, Environment, Eric Holder, Events, Food Police, Food Stamp, Foreign Policy, Freedom, Gas Price, Gun Control, Hope and Change, Immigration, Iran's Nuclear Threat, Israel, Liars, Michele obama, Middle East Peace, Middle East War, Nanny State, Obama's America 2016, ObamaCare, Obamanation, Oust Obama, President Obama, Propaganda, Redistribution of Wealth, Shariah Law, Slacker In Chief, Socialist, The Hope and The Change, The Stakes for the 2012 Election, United Nations, United States Constitution, United States Sovereignty, US Military, White House Fraud, You Didn't Build That

 Chilling Letter from Proctor & Gamble to Obama
Who would have thought, and yet many are thinking it.


By Lou Pritchett, Procter & Gamble

                                A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO THE PRESIDENT

* THE LAST SENTENCE IS THE MOST CHILLING

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America ‘s true living legends

– an Acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world’s highest
Rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize
Him as the foremost leader in change management.. Lou changed the way
America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to
Be known as “partnering.”

Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble

and over the course of 36 years; made corporate history.

AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA 

Dear President Obama: 

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike 
Any of the others, you truly scare me. 

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you. 

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive 
Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no 
Visible signs of support. 

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth 
Growing up in America and culturally you are not an American. 

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll. 

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus 
Don’t understand it at its core. 

You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others. 

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned 
Yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to 
Publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.. 

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America ‘ 
Crowd and deliver this message abroad. 

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style 
Country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector. 

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system 
With a government controlled one. 

You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly 
Capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves. 

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose 
That lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of 
Living in the world. 

You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics 
Against certain banks and corporations. 

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from 
Challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals. 

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider 
Opposing points of view from intelligent people. 

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both 
Omnipotent and omniscient. 

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything 
You do. 

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the 
Limbaugh’s, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, 
Conservative points of view. 

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing. 

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will 
Probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years. 

Lou Pritchett 
*
*
This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it.
Big surprise. Since it hit the Internet, however, it has had over
500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for
good men and women to do nothing.. It’s happening right now.

The CHANGE is here!!

90% of Americans will forward this.

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH!

Obama The “Slacker In Chief”

October 3, 2012 in Economic Deception, Economy, Election, Foreign Policy, Homeland Security, Obama's America 2016, Oust Obama, President Obama, Propaganda, Slacker In Chief

NEW YORK — Concerning the fun parts of his job, Barack Obama resembles the Energizer Bunny. If there are crowds to wow, entertainers to schmooze or donors to pitch, Obama is Johnny on the spot.
Too bad Obama’s sparks stop flying when it comes time for the serious, heavy lifting of the presidency.
This phenomenon’s most chilling example involves Obama’s national security-related presidential daily brief. As the conservative Government Accountability Institute calculated, and Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen first reported Sept. 10, Obama attended only 43.8 percent of his daily briefings between Jan. 23, 2009, (three days after his inauguration) and May 31, 2012.

[yframe url=’http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xaYFtC__RI’]
Available nearly every day, the briefing allows the commander-in-chief to hear directly from top intelligence professionals about the latest threats to U.S. safety. These experts are on hand to answer questions, hear suggestions and otherwise help Obama foil America’s enemies.
But Obama has had higher priorities.
According to the institute’s data culled from the official White House calendar and Politico.com’s news coverage of that schedule, Obama chose to skip his daily briefings and, instead, simply read his briefing book.
This is a bit like studying one’s chest X-rays at home while spurning a radiologist’s offer to interpret them and answer pertinent questions.
In this sense, Obama quietly reviewed his national security X-rays alone during 56.2 percent of the time the institute analyzed. Obama missed 61.6 percent of these briefings in 2011.
Obama skipped his briefings between last Sept. 4 and 11, the entire week before the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, suffered an Islamic terror attack that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, technical officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.
Who knows if a briefer’s classified utterance, or a particularly astute question from Obama, might have triggered tighter security in Benghazi and perhaps prevented the murders of four Americans?
Even worse, as Thiessen reports, Obama postponed and eventually skipped his briefing on the day after these planned and deliberate assassinations. This liberated Obama for a truly indispensable responsibility that day. As American embassies burned brightly throughout the Islamic world, Obama jetted off on Air Force One for a campaign fundraiser in America’s least solemn city — Las Vegas.
At last, three days after the Benghazi bloodshed, and nine days after his previous briefing, Obama sat still for a proper briefing Sept. 14, the White House schedule shows. Perhaps the scrutiny of Thiessen and other critics finally has inspired Obama to attend his briefings with the regularity of his predecessors.
Obama this week met with exactly zero world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, not least of them Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who wants to stop Iran from redecorating Jerusalem and Tel Aviv with mushroom clouds. Obama found time, however, to serve as “eye candy” for Whoopi Goldberg and the cast of “The View.”
Obama has shirked his domestic obligations, too. He reportedly has held just two Cabinet meetings this year — on Jan. 31 and July 26.
While claiming to be totally focused on reducing naggingly high unemployment, Obama has not met with his Jobs Council since January. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney explained, “The president’s obviously got a lot on his plate.” This has included a $38,000-per-plate fundraiser at the Manhattan home of actress Sarah Jessica Parker and golf, of which Obama has enjoyed some 104 rounds as president.
Obama’s dereliction of duty would be bad enough if he were a latter-day Eisenhower: a well-respected, perhaps feared, world leader enjoying prosperity at home and peace (or at least a manageable Cold War) overseas.
Instead, Obama grows increasingly comical, the domestic economy languishes, and the American flag has become an alternative fuel source across the Middle East. Nonetheless, Ike Jr. parties like it’s 1959.
Perhaps Obama has devolved from president to slacker-in-chief in an elaborate display of empathy for America’s 12.5 million unemployed. With so many citizens not working, Obama may reckon, why should he?